The Effect of Using Zoom Towards online English Teaching And Learning Process In The Post Pandemic Era

Resdilla Pratiwi

Abstract


This research deals with online teaching and learning process, the objective of this study is to explore the effect of Zoom use for online English teaching and learning process in the post pandemic era. The study was designed in mixed research model with combine Quantitative and Qualitative data. The data of this Study was students in the First semester in English Study Program. In the Quantitative aspect of the study, quasi experimental design, with a pretest-posttest control group was used and the data were analyzed by two factor variance analysis for mixed-measurements. The analysis indicated that both learning environments have different effect on the success of students and that supporting traditional environment by using zoom is more affective for increase of English teaching and learning process. For the qualitative aspect of the study, content analysis techniques were employed to analyze the data which were collected by open-ended question forms. The analysis shows that students developed positive opinions towards the use of Zoom in their courses. They demanded the same practice in their other courses as well. They reported that learning could also take place unconsciously and the messages which delivered directly by Zoom Virtual is more satisfied for their English learning. However, a few students have expressed adverse opinions about signal unstable in their area and excessive quotas during using this application. Finally, it is suggested that use of Zoom in education process be encouraged as a supportive technology


Keywords


Zoom; social media; mobile social learning; students’ performance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arteaga Sánchez, R. C. (2014). Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012.

Bogdan, R. C. (2006). Qualitative research for education to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Bouhnik, D. &. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education. 13, 217-231.

Boyd, D. M. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.

Church, K. &. (2013). What's up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging be-haviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493225.

Cain, J., & Policastri, A. (2011). Using Facebook as an informal learning environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(10): 207. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7510207.

Cetinkaya, L., & Sütçü, S. S., (2016). Parents’ restrictions on their children’s use of information technologies and their reasons. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 18-36.

Church, K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What's up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging be-haviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 352-361). New York, USA: ACM. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493225

Cifuentes, O. E., & Lents, N. H. (2011). Increasing student-teacher interactions at an urban commuter campus through instant messaging and online office hours. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 1-13. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7314

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed- methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.58102

Cifuentes, O. E. (2011). Increasing student-teacher interactions at an urban commuter campus through instant messaging and online office hours. Electronic Journal of Science Education. http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7314.

Condowe, W. (2014). Interpersonal Metafunction in Bingu wa Mutharika's Second Term Pilitical Discourse: A Systemic Functional Grammatical Approach. International Journal and Linguistics, 1-15.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Advanced mixed- methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks,: Sage.

Doering, A. L.-B. (2008). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of instant messaging in two educational contexts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 5-12.

Fraenkel, J. R. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston:: McGraw-Hill.

Haratyan, F. (2011). Halliday's SFL and Social Meaning. 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences, 1-5.

Jingxia, L., & etc. (2015). Interpersonal Interpretation of Personal Pronoun in Marriage Advertising . Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 1-6.

Kusnekoff, J. M. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1038727.

Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536.

Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 329-347. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9115-y

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults. Washington D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life.

Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Information Systems Research, 25, 796-816. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536

Mayer, R. E. (2003). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Plana, M. G.-C. (2013). Improving learners’ reading skills through instant short messageA sample study using.

Statista. (2016). Statistics and market data on mobile internet & apps. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com.

Sweeny, S. M. (2010). Writing for the instant messaging and text messaging generation: Using new litera-cies to support writing instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(2), 121-130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.2.4

Siburian, T. A. (2013). The Effect of Interpersonal Communication, Organization Culture, Job Satisfaction and Achievement Motivation to Organizational Commitment Of State High School Teacher in the Dosctrict Humbang Hasundutan, North Sumatera, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1-18.

Smit, I. (2012). WhatsApp with BlackBerry; Can messengers (BBM) be MXit? In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on world wide web applications. Cape Town, South Africa: Cape Peninsula University of Technology. Retrieved from. Cape Town, South Africa:: Cape Peninsula.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. B. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan. E. A. (2001). İçerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri [Content analysis and example applications for oral, written, and other documents]. Ankara: Epsilon Yayınları.

Taylor, D. G., Lewin, E. J., & Strutton, D. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks? How gender and age shape receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 258-275. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-1-258-275

Towner, T., & Munoz, C. L. (2011). Facebook and education: A classroom connection? In C. Wankel (Ed.) Educating educators with social media: Cutting-edge technologies in higher education, (Vol. 1, pp. 33-57). Bingley, U, K.: Emerald.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000001005

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6.Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in social sciences (6nd ed.)]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Zaidieh, A. J. (2012). The use of social networking in education: challenges and opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT),. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/76e2/1d0c5cc14238463a09eec33d5d06573a32d2.pdf.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.2962

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 657 times
PDF - 306 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Resdilla Pratiwi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.