Sintesis Indikator Lingkungan Belajar Konstruktivis sebagai Instrumen Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

Della Amelia, Rusman Rusman

Abstract


Sains sebagai pengetahuan ilmiah memiliki hakikat dan karakteristik khusus, sehingga memerlukan pendekatan tersendiri dalam membelajarkannya. Pendekatan pembelajaran berbasis konstruktivis telah lama disarankan untuk membelajarkan sains, karena merupakan pendekatan pembelajaran yang mampu mengakomodasi hakikat dan karakteristik sains sebagai ilmu pengetahuan. Pembelajaran yang berlandaskan pada sudut pandang konstruktivis sudah pasti memerlukan lingkungan belajar yang berbasis konstruktivis juga. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses, rasional, dan hasil sintesis indikator esensial Lingkungan Belajar Konstruktivis (LBK). Melalui systematic literature review dihasilkan 5 indikator inti dengan masing-masing indikator inti mengandung 3 hingga 4 subindikator. Validitas isi terhadap masing-masing indikator inti, subindikator, dan deskripsi perilaku dilakukan menggunakan metode pertimbangan ahli (expert judgement). Pertimbangan ahli (expert judgement) dilakukan oleh satu orang ahli bidang pedagogi Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) untuk validitas logis (logical validity) dan oleh dua orang ahli bidang kurikulum dan pembelajaran untuk validitas rupa (face validity). Kelima indikator dan masing-masing subindikator serta deskripsi perilaku yang telah disintesis dinyatakan valid secara konten


Keywords


sains, indikator, lingkungan belajar konstruktivis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, S. R., Purnamasari, V., & Darsimah, D. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu …, 3(5), 2040–2047. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/747

Arifin, Z. (2011). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. In Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran (pp. 83–85). PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Bächtold, M. (2013). What Do Students “Construct†According to Constructivism in Science Education? Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2477–2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9369-7

Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Norby, M., & Ronning, R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and instruction (5th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Damanik, B. E. (2019). Pengaruh Fasilitas Dan Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan, 9(1).

Dzimiri, W., & Marimo, S. (2015). Challenges faced in the implementation of the Zimbabwe localised Advanced level Geography syllabus: A case of Gweru district high schools. Global Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 4(2).

Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Abdullah, R., & Samala, A. D. (2021). 21st Century Skills : TVET dan Tantangan Abad 21. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4340–4348. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1458

Johnson, B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LERI.0000022279.89075.9f

Jonassen, D. H., & Murphy, L. R. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Konstruktivisme dalam Kurikulum 2013. http://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2014/03/konstruktivisme-dalam-kurikulum-2013-2311-2311-2311

Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered Education and Constructivism: Challenges, Concerns, and Clarity for Teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311

Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2014). The constructivist classroom learning environment and its associations with critical thinking ability of secondary school students in Liberal Studies. Learning Environments Research, 17(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9158-x

Labudde, P. (2008). Four decades of research in science education. Munster.

Moustafa, A., Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, O., & Eshach, H. (2013). Do Junior High School Students Perceive Their Learning Environment as Constructivist? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9403-y

Mustafidah, I. D., Mutohar, P. M., & Tanzeh, A. (2022). Prestasi Belajar Siswa di Era Covid 19 : Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring , Motivasi Belajar dan Lingkungan Belajar di MI Se-Kecamatan Sumbergempol Tulungagung. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 355–363.

Nurhidayati, E. (2017). Pedagogi Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 1(1), 1–14.

Pane, A., & Darwis Dasopang, M. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945

Rahmi, Z. (2019). Lingkungan Belajar Sebagai Pengelolaan Kelas: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. E-Tech, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/XXXXXX-XX-0000-00

Rusman. (2019). Manajemen Kurikulum (Cetakan Ke). PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Rusman, M.-M. P. (2014). Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Edisi Kedua. In Cet. V (Vol. 1).

Saylor, J. G., & Alexander, M. V. (1974). Planning curriculum for school. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Schunk, D. H. (2015). Learning theories: An educational perspective (7th ed.). Merrill.

Silviana Nur Faizah. (2017). Hakikat Belajar dan Pembelajaran. At-Thullab: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Volume, 1(2).

Sugrah, N. (2019). Implementasi Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 2(2), 121–138.

Tadesse, T., Melese, W., Ferede, B., Getachew, K., & Asmamaw, A. (2022). Constructivist learning environments and forms of learning in Ethiopian public universities: testing factor structures and prediction models. Learning Environments Research, 25(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09351-4

Taylor, P. C. (2014). Constructivism. In Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 1–7). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_102-2

Taylor, P. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1991). CLES: AN INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSING.

Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2

Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: an exploratory investigation. In / Learning and Instruction (Vol. 11).

Tunca, N. (2015). The regression level of constructivist learning environment characteristics on classroom environment characteristics supporting critical thinking. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 181–200. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.11

Uslu, S., & Körükcü, M. (2020). The Outcomes of Constructivist Learnıng Envıroments from the Perspectives of Secondary School Students. International Education Studies, 13(8), 16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n8p16

Widodo, A. (2004). Constructivist-oriented lessons: The learning environments and the teaching sequences. Peter Lang.

Widodo, A. (2007). Konstruktivisme dan Pembelajaran Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(1), 91–105.

Widodo, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Dasar-Dasar untuk Praktik. UPI Press.

Widodo, A., Maria, R. A., & Fitriani, A. (2017). Constructivist Learning Environment During Virtual and Real Laboratory Activities. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i1.7959

Wild, A. (2015). Relationships between High School Chemistry Students’ Perceptions of a Constructivist Learning Environment and their STEM Career Expectations. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2284–2305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1076951

Woodfolk, A. (2020). Educational Psychology Active Learning Edition (14th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Zeidan, A. (2015). Constructivist Learning Environment Among Palestinian Science Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9527-z




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3203

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2106 times
PDF - 822 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Della Amelia, Rusan2

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.