Analisis Praktikal dan Pengembangan Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium (DKL) Cara Kerja Enzim Katalase bagi Kelas XII SMA
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (1) menganalisis Desain kegiatan laboratorium Cara kerja Enzim di SMA di DKI Jakarta (2) mengembangkan DKL Cara kerja Enzim, (3) mengetahui kelayakan DKL Cara kerja Enzim yang dikembangkan. Metode penelitian yaitu Research and Development (R&D) digunakan dengan model ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Masalah praktikal pada panduan praktikum yang digunakan oleh sekolah-sekolah di DKI Jakarta dapat diklasifikasikan menjadi 6 jenis kesalahan diantaranya: (1) cara kerja praktikum yang kurang detail, (2) tidak menjelaskan langkah apa yang dilakukan untuk membuat larutan, (3) tidak adanya prosedur keselamatan kerja, (4) pemilihan kalimat instruksi langkah kerja yang kurang tepat dan (5) kurang tepatnya pertanyaan praktikum. DKL hasil pengembangan yaitu DKL alternatif yang terdiri dari alat praktikum dan lembar kerja praktikum. Berdasarkan hasil uji coba Desain kegiatan laboratorium yang dikembangkan sudah valid dan layak untuk digunakan.Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Astika, E., Anggraeni, S., & Supriatno, B. (2020). Analisis Komponen Penyusun Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium Enzim Katalase. BIODIK, 6(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9469
Chamany, K., Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2008). Feature Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning Making Biology Learning Relevant to Students: Integrating People, History, and Context into College Biology Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08
Darmawati, W. T., Supriatno, B., & Anggraini, S. (2021). EduMatSains Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains Analisis dan Rekonstruksi Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium (DKL) Materi Spermatophyta Melalui Petunjuk Praktikum (Vol. 6, Issue 1). http://ejournal.uki.ac.id/index.php/edumatsains
DebBurman, S. K. (2002). Learning how scientists work: Experiential research projects to promotecell biology learning and scientific process skills. Cell Biology Education, 1(4), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.02-07-0024
Devezer, B., Nardin, L. G., Baumgaertner, B., & Buzbas, E. O. (2019). Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity. PLoS ONE, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216125
Ferreira, S., & Morais, A. M. (2020). Practical Work in Science Education: Study of Different Contexts of Pedagogic Practice. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1547–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9743-6
Heliawati, L., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2021). Creative Problem-Solving Learning through Open-Ended Experiment for Students’ Understanding and Scientific Work Using Online Learning. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 14, Issue 4). www.e-iji.net
Komorek, M., & Duit, R. (2004). The teaching experiment as a powerful method to develop and evaluate teaching and learning sequences in the domain of non-linear systems. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690310001614717
Kurniasih, W., Anggraeni, S., & Supriatno, B. (2020). Alternatif Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Materi Osmosis Berbasis Ancorb. Biodik, 6(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i3.9451
Liani, M. L., Nyamongo, I. K., Pulford, J., & Tolhurst, R. (2021). An intersectional gender analysis of familial and socio-cultural drivers of inequitable scientific career progression of researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Health Research and Policy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-021-00213-3
Mustakim, Z., Chamdani, M., & Mahmudah, U. (2019). Comparison of efficiency school performance between natural and social sciences: A bootstrapping data envelopment analysis. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.22837
Nasir, M., Kunci, K., Mahasiswa, M., Kesulitan Belajar, ;, Praktikum, ;, & Proyek, B. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar dan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa dalam Praktikum Berbasis Proyek. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 5(1).
Nunaki, J. H., Damopolii, I., Kandowangko, N. Y., & Nusantari, E. (2019). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning to train the students’ metacognitive skills based on gender differences. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12232a
Pea Yunita Meishanti, O., Fariyanti, I., & Wahab Hasbullah Tambakberas Jombang, K. A. (2020). Analisis Keterlaksanaan Praktikum Biologi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Psikomotor Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA di MA Al Ihsan Tembelang Jombang.
Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J. U. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised controlled field experiment with sixth-grade students on the effects of content and language integrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001
Putri, W. A., Astalini, A., & Darmaji, D. (2022). Analisis Kegiatan Praktikum untuk Dapat Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 3361–3368. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2638
Rahmat, I., & Chanunan, S. (2018). Open Inquiry in Facilitating Metacognitive Skills on High School Biology Learning: An Inquiry on Low and High Academic Ability. In International Journal of Instruction (Vol. 11, Issue 4). www.e-iji.net
Sinurat, L., Supriatno, B., & Anggraeni, S. (2021). Analisis Komponen Penyusun Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Materi Kerja Enzim Katalase. Biodik, 7(3), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v7i3.13028
Supriatno, B. (2013). Pengembangan program pengembangan praktikum biologi sekolah berbasis ANCORB untuk mengembangkan kemampuan dan mengembangkan desain kegiatan laboratorium(Disertasi Doktor). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3224
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1902 timesPDF - 1016 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Heru Setiawan, Bambang Supriatno, Sri Anggraeni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



1.png)