Investigasi Kreativitas Mahasiswa melalui Software Simulasi Komputer: Embedded Experimentalmodel

Muh Tawil, Sukarna Sukarna

Abstract


Pada saat covid-19 dan minimnya alat praktikum di laboratorium IPA sehingga mahasiswa tidak dapat melakukan praktikum manual, masalah ini dapat diatasi dengan menerapkan sofware simulasi komputer. Penelitian ini bertujuan  untuk mengivestigasi kreativitas mahasiswa  semester ganjil tahun 2021/2022 sebanyak 120 orang, terdiri dari kelompok 1 experimen ( n = 60) dan kelompok 2 kontrol (n = 60) program studi pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Makassar. Desain penelitian embedded experimentalmodel dengan metode pengambilan sampel secara random. Instrumen terdiri dari lembar observasi, angket, dan tes kreativitas yang valid dan nilai reliabilitas berturut-turut sebesar 99 persen, 98 persen, dan 98 persen. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan peningkatan kreativitas antara kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol. Mahasiswa dalam kelompok eksperimen juga menunjukkan respon positif menggunakan software simulasi komputer dan sangat membantu dosen dalam pembelajaran. Temuan mendukung gagasan bahwa mahasiswa pendidikan IPA harus dilatih dalam penggunaan software simulasi komputer untuk meningkatkan kreativitasnya. Ini menempatkan sebuah tanggung jawab dari pihak berwenang pendidikan untuk pengadaan software simulasi komputer untuk digunakan dalam belajar IPA di perguruan tinggi

Keywords


software, simulasi komputer, kreativitas, embedded experimental model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2011). The TriLab, a novel ICT based triple access mode laboratory education model. Computers & Education, 56(1), 262–274.

Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1986a). The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2), 121–143.

Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1986b). The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2), 121–143.

Alghafri, A. S. R., & Ismail, H. N. Bin. (2014). The Effects of Integrating Creative and Critical Thinking on Schools Students’ Thinking. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(6), 518–525. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2014.v4.410

Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001

Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. (2020). Effect of scaffolding strategies on higher-order thinking skills in science classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 718–729. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.718

Amin, D. I., & Ikhsan, J. (2021). Improving higher order thinking skills via semi second life. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.261

An, D., Song, Y., & Carr, M. (2016a). A Comparison Of Two Models Of Creativity: Divergent Thinking And Creative Expert Performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 78–84.

Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a

Arlini, H., Humairah, N., & Sartika, D. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share dengan Teknik Advance Organizer (Vol. 3, Issue 2).

Aşkin, Ö. E., & Öz, E. (2020). Cross-national comparisons of students’ science success based on gender variability: Evidence from TIMSS. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.186

Bono, E. D. (2007). Revolusi berpikir Edward de Bono : Mengajari anak anda berpikir canggih dan kreatif dalam memecahkan masalah dan memantik ide-ide baru .

Bruner, J. S. (1960a). The Process of Education. Hardvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1960b). The Process of Education. Hardvard University Press.

Capron Puozzo, I., & Audrin, C. (2021). Improving self-efficacy and creative self-efficacy to foster creativity and learning in schools. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100966

Cho, J. Y. (2017a). An Investigation of Design Studio Performance In Relation To Creativity, Spatial Ability, And Visual Cognitive Style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67–78.

Cho, J. Y. (2017b). An Investigation of Design Studio Performance In Relation To Creativity, Spatial Ability, And Visual Cognitive Style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67–78.

Clark, R. C., & Richard, E. M. (2016). . eâ€Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Proven Guidelines For Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.

D’Souza, R. (2021). What characterises creativity in narrative writing, and how do we assess it? Research findings from a systematic literature search. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100949

Ekmekci, A., & Gulacar, O. (2015). A case study for comparing the effectiveness of a computer simulation and a hands-on activity on learning electric circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1438a

Elena, D., Elena L, Ilinaab, Aleksander, N., Latkinb, & Anna, I. K. (2016). Development of Creative Potential of Cinema Tourism . International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, 11(11), 4015–4024.

Eunice, E. O. (2015). The Effects Of A Web-Based Computer Simulation On Students’ Conceptual Understanding Of Rate Of Reaction And Attitude Towards Chemistry . . JBSE, 14(5), 627–640.

Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Reid, S., & Lemaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103

Firdaus, & Darmadi. (2017). Shaping scientific attitude of biology education students through research-based teaching. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995214

Flisher, C. (2010). Getting plugged in: An overview of Internet addiction. In Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health (Vol. 46, Issue 10, pp. 557–559). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01879.x

Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek Taxation Information System. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.013

Frankel, J. R., & Wallen. (2009). How To Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Mc.Graw-Hill.

Fuadi, Sumaryanto, T., & Lestari, W. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotor Pembelajaran IPA Materi Tumbuhan Hijau Berbasis Starter Experiment Approach Berwawasan Konservasi. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation (JERE), 4(1), 1–11.

Gunawan, Harjono, A., Hermansyah, & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided inquiry model through virtual laboratory to enhance students’ science process skills on heat concept. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345

Guswita, S., Anggoro, B. S., Haka, N. B., Handoko, A., Islam, U., Raden, N., & Lampung, I. (2018). Analisis keterampilan proses sains dan sikap ilmiah peserta didik kelas XI mata pelajaran biologi di SMAAl-Azhar 3 Bandar Lampung. BIOSFER Jurnal Tadris Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 249–258. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/biosfer/index

Harlen, & Elstgeest, J. (1993). UNESCO Source Book for Science Teaching in the Primary School. NBT, New Delhi. Biologi, 9(2), 249–259.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning About Atoms, Molecules, And Chemical Bonds : A Case Study Of Multiple-Model Use In Grade 11 Chemistry . Int. J.Sci.Edu, 84, 352–381.

Hawi, N. S. (2012). Internet Addiction Among Adolescents In Lebanon. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1044-1053.

He, Y., & Li, Y. (2020a). Research on teaching method of computer application course based on evidence-based teaching method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1648(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1648/3/032182

He, Y., & Li, Y. (2020b). Research on teaching method of computer application course based on evidence-based teaching method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1648(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1648/3/032182

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1987). Creativity and Learning. National Education Association.

Heradio, R., De-La, T. L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and Remote Labs In Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14–38.

Herga, N. R., Glažar, S. A., & Dinevski, D. (2015). Dynamic Visualization in the Virtual Laboratory Enhances the Fundamental Understanding of Chemical Concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(3), 351–365.

Hiller, J. R., Johnson. I. D, & Styer, D. F. (1995). Quantum Mechanics Simulations. The Consrtium for Upper-Level Physics Software. .

Houtz, J. C., & Krug, D. (1995). Assessment of Creativity: Resolving A Mid-Life Crisis. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 269–300.

Hu, R., Wu, Y. Y., & Shieh, C. J. (2016a). Effects of virtual reality integrated creative thinking instruction on students’ creative thinking abilities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1226a

Hu, R., Wu, Y. Y., & Shieh, C. J. (2016b). Effects of virtual reality integrated creative thinking instruction on students’ creative thinking abilities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1226a

Huang, R. T., Jang, S. J., MacHtmes, K., & Deggs, D. (2012). Investigating the roles of perceived playfulness, resistance to change and self-management of learning in mobile English learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01239.x

Hung, J. F., & Tsai, C. Y. (2020). The effects of a virtual laboratory and meta-cognitive scaffolding on students’ data modeling competences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.923

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Suwandi, T., & Titin. (2020). Implementation supplementary book of green consumerism: Improving students hots in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.227

Irina, L. P., Depsames, Olga, V., Serova, Maria, V., Shcherbakova, Svetlana, I., & Yakovleva. (2016). Design Education: Peculiarities of Design Students’ Creativity Development. International Journal Of Environmental & Science, 11(13), 6221–6622.

Irwanto, R., & Prodjosantoso. (2020). Undergraduate Students’ Science Process Skills In Terms Of Some Variables: A Perspective From Indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 751–764.

Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., & Kolonial Prodjosantoso, A. (2018). Undergraduate students’ science process skills in terms of some variables: a perspective from Indonesia. Journal of Bactic Science Education, 17(5), 751–764.

Joyce, B., Weil, Marsha, & Showers, B. (1992). Models of Teaching. Fourth Edition. Allyn & Bacon.

KaramustafaoÄŸlu, S. (2011a). Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Using I Diagrams. In Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ (Vol. 3, Issue 1). http://www.eurasianjournals.com/index.php/ejpce

Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011b). Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Using I Diagrams. Eurasian. Phys. Chem. Educ, 3(1), 26–38.

Kem, J. E. (1994). Designing Effective Instructional. Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Kuo, P. H. (2016a). Effects of synchronous web-based instruction on students’ thinking styles and creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1234a

Kuo, P. H. (2016b). Effects of synchronous web-based instruction on students’ thinking styles and creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1234a

Lebuda, I., Zieli´nska, A., & Maciej, K. (2021). On Surface And Core Predictors Of Real-Life Creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100973.

Lestari, T., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Jatmiko, B. (2021). Virtual classroom critical thinking as an alternative teaching model to improve students’ critical thinking skills in pandemic Coronavirus disease era. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2003–2015. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.4.2003

Liu, H., Elstner, M., Kaxiras, E., Frauenheim, T., Hermans, J., & Yang, W. (2001). Quantum Mechanics Simulation of Protein Dynamics on Long Timescale. In Proteins (Vol. 44).

Luo, M., Wang, Z., Sun, D., Wan, Z. H., & Zhu, L. (2020). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: The design and validation of an assessment with a focus on reasoning and the use of evidence. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.261

Maharani, D. A., Satriawati, G., & Musyrifah, E. (2020). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis melalui model generative multi-representation learning. Algoritma: Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v2i2.18798

Martiningsih, M., Situmorang, R. P., Hastuti, S. P., Studi, P., Biologi, P., & Biologi, F. (2018). Hubungan keterampilan generik sains dan sikap ilmiah melalui model inkuiri ditinjau dari domain kognitif. In Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (JPS) (Vol. 06, Issue 01). http://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/JPKIMIA

Maryeni, L., Siregar, N. S., Roza, Y., & Jalinus. (2020). Development of Computer-Based Learning Media Using Mind Map For Learning Mathematics In Topics Of Rectangle And Triangle At Secondary School. Companion Proceedings of the SEADRIC, 73–84.

Marzhan, D., Maxat, D., Akbota, A., Moldabek, K., Rabiga, K., & Rysbayeva, G. (2022). The development of computational skills of visually impaired children of primary classes. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(2), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V17I2.6848

Maulidah, S. S., & Prima, E. C. (2018). Using Physics Education Technology as Virtual Laboratory in Learning Waves and Sounds. Journal of Science Learning, 1(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i3.11797

Mckagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., Lemaster, R., & Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and Researching PhET simulations for Teaching Quantum Mechanics. Physics Education Technologi Journal. http://phet.colorado.edu

Mnguni, L., & Mokiwa, H. (2020). The integration of online teaching and learning in stem education as a response to the covid-19 pandemic. In Journal of Baltic Science Education (Vol. 19, Issue 6, pp. 1040–1042). Scientia Socialis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/20.19.1040

Mubarrok, M. F., Mulyaningsih, S., Fisika, J., Matematika, F., Ilmu, D., & Alam, P. (2014). Penerapan pembelajaran fisika pada materi cahaya dengan media phet simulations untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa di SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 03(01), 76–80. http://phet.colorado.edu/in/about

Muñoz-Martínez, Y., Domínguez-Santos, S., Sen-Pumares, S. de la, & Laborda, J. G. (2022). Teachers’ professional development through the education practicum: A proposal for university-school collaboration*. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(2), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i2.6832

Northcott, B., Miliszewska, I., & Dakich, E. (2007). ICT for (I)nspiring (C)reative (T)hinking. Proceeding Ascilite Singapore. , 761–768.

Nulhakim, L., Setiawan, R., & Saefullah, A. (2020). Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika. JPPPF, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/1

Patphol, M. (2020). Developing a Training Curriculum to Enhancing Teachers’ Learning Management Skills for Promoting Learners’ Creativity and Innovation: A Case Study of Thai Teachers. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.7.1.181-187

Peciuliauskiene, P., Tamoliune, G., & Trepule, E. (2022). Exploring the roles of information search and information evaluation literacy and pre-service teachers’ ICT self-efficacy in teaching. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00339-5

Penn, M., & Mavuru, L. (2020). Assessing pre-service teachers’ reception and attitudes towards virtual laboratory experiments in life sciences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/20.19.1092

Prihatiningtyas, S., Prastowo, T., & Jatmiko, B. (2013). Imlementasi simulasi phet dan kit sederhana untuk mengajarkan keterampilan psikomotor siswa pada pokok bahasan alat optik. InJPII (Vol. 2, Issue 1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii

Rahmawati, A., Nisfah, N. L., & Kusairi, S. (2019). The Capability Analysis of High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) on Dynamic Electricity Material in Junior High School. JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika). https://doi.org/10.21009/1

Ramdani, A., Artayasa, I. P., Yustiqvar, M., & Nisrina, N. (2021). Enhancing prospective teachers’ creative thinking skills: a study of the transition from structured to open inquiry classes. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.41758

Rothes, A., Lemos, M. S., & Gonçalves, T. (2014). Motives and Beliefs of Learners Enrolled in Adult Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1252

Ruqoyyah, R., Fatkhurrohman, M. A., & Arfiani, Y. (2020). Implementasi Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Pop-up book untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 8(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v8i1.6166

Rusli, M. A., Tawil, M., Kasmad Bin Nur, M., & Negeri Makassar, U. (n.d.). Description Of Skills In Reading Measurement Results By Class VII Students As A Result Of Distance Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic At SMPN 18 Makassar. Proceeding of The International Conference on Science and Advanced Technology (ICSAT, 121–127. Retrieved February 4, 2024, from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/ icsat/article/view/17582

Said,A P., Tawil, M., & Rusli, M. (2020). Pengaruh metode eksperimen terhadap keterampilan proses sains peserta didik kelas VIII SMPN 13 Makassar (Studi pada Materi Pokok Usaha dan Pesawat Sederhana). Jurnal IPA Terpadu, 3(2), 87–95.

Salmon, A. K., & Barrera, M. X. (2021). Intentional questioning to promote thinking and learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100822

Saputra, R., Susilawati, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Simulasi Phet (Physics Education Technology) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i2.1459

Setiawan, R., Mardapi, D., Aman, & Karyanto, U. B. (2020). Multiple intelligences-based creative curriculum: The best practice. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.611

Sinulingga, P., Jhoni Hartanto, T., & Santoso, B. (2016). Implementasi Pembelajaran Fisika Berbantuan Media Simulasi PhET untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Listrik Dinamis. JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/1

Sukarno UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin, S., Permanasari, A., & Hamidah, I. (2013). The Profile of Science Process Skill (SPS) Student at Secondary High School (Case Study in Jambi). International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER), 1(1), 2347–3878. www.ijser.in

Sumaryanto, T., &Lestari (2015). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian psikomotor pembelajaran ipa materi tumbuhan hijau berbasis starter experiment approach berwawasan konservasi. InJERE (Vol. 4, Issue 1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere

Suryandari, K. C., Rokhmaniyah, & Wahyudi. (2021). The effect of scientific reading based project model in empowering creative thinking skills of preservice teacher in elementary school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.3.1329

Susantini, E., Faizah, U., Prastiwi, M. S., & Suryanti. (2016). Developing educational video to improve the use of scientific approach in cooperative learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.725

Tawil, M., Tampa, A., Said, M. A., & Suryansari, K. (2022). Exploration the skills of teachers: Implementation technological pedagogical content knowledge. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(12), 4713–4733. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i12.8593

Tawil, M., & Dahlan, A. (2021). Application of Interactive Audio Visual Media to Improve Students’ Creative Thinking Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1752(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012076

Tawil, M., Said, M. A., & Suryansari, K. (2023). Authentic assessment development science to assess student competency. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i2.3294

Topalsan, A. K. (2020). Development of scientific inquiry skills of science teaching through argument-focused virtual laboratory applications. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.628

Vahid, K. L., Afrooz, G., Shekoohi-yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a Creative Interpersonal Problem Solving Program Improve Creative Thinking In Gifted Elementary Students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30(7), 175-185.

Varank, İ. (2006). A COMPARISON OF A COMPUTER-BASED AND A LECTURE-BASED COMPUTER LITERACY COURSE: A TURKISH CASE. In Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (Vol. 2, Issue 3). www.ejmste.com

Wijnen, F., Walma van der Molen, J., & Voogt, J. (2021). Measuring primary school teachers’ attitudes towards stimulating higher-order thinking (SHOT) in students: Development and validation of the SHOT questionnaire. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100954

Wong, W. K., Chen, K. P., & Chang, H. M. (2020). A comparison of a virtual lab and a microcomputer-based lab for scientific modelling by college students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.157

Yair, Y., Mintz, R., & Litvak, S. (2001). 3D-Virtual Reality in Science Education: An Implication for Astronomy Teaching. In Jl. of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching (Vol. 20, Issue 3).

Zaturrahmi, Z., Festiyed, F., & Ellizar, E. (2020). The Utilization of Virtual Laboratory in Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6474

Zibenberg, A., & Da’as, R. (2022). The Role Of Implicit Theories In Predicting Creativity FosteringTeacher Behavior: Gender As Moderator. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101024.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.6165

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 551 times
PDF - 178 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Muh. Tawil, Sukarna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.