1.png)
An Analysis of Written and Spoken Discourse in English Assignment and Classroom Discussion
Abstract
This study analyzed the students’ written and spoken discourse in English class about the material of congratulating people. In daily conversation, students have informal conversations. However, when it turns to discussion, they sometimes use formal forms of language even when talking to other students. Therefore, this study aims to find the types of formal language forms used by students during the discussion and the purposes of the use. The participants of this study are the eighth-grade students divided into four groups. A qualitative descriptive approach is applied in this study, and the data are analyzed with IRF. From the analysis, the students used formal forms of language in four types: neutral lexis, complete form, politeness, and turn-taking. This study observes the discussion between the students and how the students interact with each other, as well as whether there is some social problem within the class. Another perception from the researchers is that students need to be motivated to speak English more during English class, even if they are discussing with their friends or when they ask questions to the teacher
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Munawwarah, S. F. (2021). Teacher-Students’ Interaction in EFL Teaching: Analyzing Patterns of Classroom Interaction. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing Dan Sastra, 5(2), 416. https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v5i2.19811
Asrar, Z., Tariq, N., & Rashid, H. (2018). The Impact of Communication Between Teachers and Students: A Case Study of the Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Karachi, Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(16), 32. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n16p32
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/9173/mod_resource/content/1/In Search of Understanding.pdf
Eggins, S. (2001). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (New). Pinter Publisher.
Fraser, B. (2021). 17 An introduction to discourse markers. In New Directions in Second Language Pragmatics (pp. 314–335). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110721775-021
Heylighen, F., & Dewaele, J.-M. (1999). Formality of Language: definition, measurement and behavioral determinants.
Irvine, J. T. (1979). Formality and Informality in Communicative Events. American Anthropologist, 81(4), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00020
Khartha, A., Baa, S., & Korompot, C. A. (2022). Teacher’s Interpersonal Communication and Its Impacts on Students’ Motivation in EFL Learning. KLASIKAL : Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 4(1), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v4i1.137
Kieu Oanh, P. T., & Hong Nhung, N. T. (2022). Constructivism learning theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning English in secondary education in Vietnam. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 12(12), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.12.12.2022.p13211
Kurniatillah, R. E., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Alek, A. (2022). Teacher-student interaction in English classroom setting. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 6(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v6i1.391
Kurniawan, M. B. (2022). Classroom Interaction in the EFL Speaking Class in Junior High School. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 10(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v10i1.47994
Liskinasih, A. (2016). Corrective Feedbacks Interaction in CLT-Adopted Classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i1.2662
Maolida, E. H. (2013). A Descriptive Study of Teacher’s Oral Feedback In an ESL Young Learner Classroom in Indonesia. K@ta, 15(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.15.2.117-124
Muhayyang, M., Nasta, M., G, H., & Sakkir, G. (2023). Students’ Affective Silence in English Classroom Interaction. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing Dan Sastra, 7(2), 290. https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v7i2.35751
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2013). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203551349
Purwati, D. (2020). The Effects of Lecturers’ Formal and Informal Talks on Students’ Understanding of the Material in the Language Learning Process. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1315
Salinan Permendikbud Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan, 1 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1669%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
Sato, M. (2015). Density and complexity of oral production in interaction: The interactionist approach and an alternative. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0016
Sembiring, L. T. A. B. (2018). Researching Students’ Interaction in Collaborative Learning Class. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i2.2197
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
Xiao-Yan, M. (2006). TeacherTalk and EFL in University Classrooms [Chongqing Normal University and Yangtze Normal University]. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/thesis_Ma_Xiaou.pdf.
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 26). Critical Discourse Studies, 19(4), 454–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1918196
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i4.6326
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 560 timesPDF - 996 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aqielah, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, Alek, Zakila Mardatila Ersyad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.