Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik

Suwanda Priyadi

Abstract


Differential item functioning (DIF) telah menjadi topik penelitian populer dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Keberadaan DIF memiliki implikasi sosial yang besar dalam pengetesan, tidak hanya bagi peserta tes secara individual, namun juga pada tingkat penyusunan dan evaluasi kebijakan publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan tinjauan kritis terhadap perkembangan publikasi ilmiah DIF menggunakan analisis bibliometrik. Data yang digunakan adalah 4.056 publikasi ilmiah DIF dalam basis data Scopus. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Amerika Serikat memiliki peran sentral dalam publikasi ilmiah DIF. Hal ini terlihat dari jumlah publikasi, jumlah afiliasi, dan jumlah kutipan yang didapatkan. Amerika Serikat juga menduduki posisi tertinggi dalam peta kolaborasi antarnegara. Sementara itu, analisis kemunculan kata kunci dan peta tematik menemukan dua tema utama dalam publikasi ilmiah DIF. Pertama, tema niche yang mencakup tema-tema seperti Rasch analysis, psychometric properties, validity, quality of life, measurement, reliability, dan patient-reported outcomes. Kedua, tema dasar yang mencakup tema-tema seperti differential item functioning, item response theory, measurement invariance, factor analysis, assessment, depression, dan gender. Hasil ini dapat menjadi referensi publikasi ilmiah yang berkaitan DIF di kemudian hari.


Keywords


dif; differential item functioning; analisis bibliometrik

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alkhammash, R. (2023). Bibliometric, Network, and Thematic Mapping Analyses of Metaphor and Discourse in Covid-19 Publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1062943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.

Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on Differential Item Functioning Methodology. dalam P. W. Holland & Howard Wainer (Ed.), Differential Item Functioning. (hlm. 3–23). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Berrío, Ã. I., Gómez-Benito, J., & Arias-Patiño, E. M. (2020). Developments and Trends in Research on Methods of Detecting Differential Item Functioning. Educational Research Review, 31, 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100340

Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). Lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Dimulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v039.i08

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An Approach for Detecting, Quantifying, and Visualizing the Evolution of A Research Field: A Practical Application to The Fuzzy Sets Theory Field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

De Morton, N. A. (2009). The Pedro Scale Is a Valid Measure of The Methodological Quality of Clinical Trials: A Demographic Study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 55(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70043-1

Dorta-González, P., Dorta-González, M. I., Santos-Peñate, D. R., & Suárez-Vega, R. (2014). Journal Topic Citation Potential and Between-Field Comparisons: The Topic Normalized Impact Factor. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.013

Eremenco, S. L., Cella, D., & Arnold, B. J. (2005). A Comprehensive Method for The Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Health Status Questionnaires. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 28(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705275342

Ghanbarpour, A., & Naderi, H. (2019). A Model-Based Method to Improve The Quality of Ranking in Keyword Search Systems Using Pseudo-Relevance Feedback. Journal of Information Science, 45(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551518799637

Gómez-Benito, J., Sireci, S., Padilla, J.-L., Hidalgo, M. D., & Benítez, I. (2018). Differential Item Functioning: Beyond Validity Evidence Based on Internal Structure. Psicothema, 30(1), 104–109.

Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Hidalgo, M. D., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2013). Type I Error and Statistical Power of The Mantel-Haenszel Procedure for Detecting Dif: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Methods, 18(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034306

Hays, R. D., Morales, L. S., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in The 21st Century. Medical Care, 38, II-28-II–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Huang, F. Y., Chung, H., Kroenke, K., Delucchi, K. L., & Spitzer, R. L. (2006). Using The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to Measure Depression Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Primary Care Patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(6), 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00409.x

Jones, R. A. (2013). Jung’s “Psychology with The Psyche†and The Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral Sciences, 3(3), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs3030408

Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Read, J. P. (2005). Toward Efficient and Comprehensive Measurement of The Alcohol Problems Continuum in College Students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(7), 1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000171940.95813.A5

Kwon, S. (2018). Characteristics of Interdisciplinary Research in Author Keywords Appearing in Korean Journals. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 23(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol23no2.5

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A New Look at The Big Five Factor Structure Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227

Mumpuni, K. E., Begimbetova, G. A., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire: Differential Item Functioning (DIF) and Calibration Using Rasch Model Analysis. Jurnal Varidika, 35(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v1i1.22995

Nugent, W. R. (2017). Understanding DIF and DTF: Description, Methods, and Implications for Social Work Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 8(2), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1086/691525

Özmercan, E. E. (2023). The Bibliometric Analysis of The Differential Item Functioning Using VOSviewer. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 8(23), 2172–2190. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoecc.794

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The Prisma 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pejtersen, J. H., Kristensen, T. S., Borg, V., & Bjorner, J. B. (2010). The Second Version of The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3_suppl), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809349858

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., Thissen, D., Revicki, D. A., Weiss, D. J., Hambleton, R. K., Liu, H., Gershon, R., Reise, S. P., Lai, J., & Cella, D. (2007). Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S22–S31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04

Rouquette, A., Hardouin, J.-B., Vanhaesebrouck, A., Sébille, V., & Coste, J. (2019). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in Composite Health Measurement Scale: Recommendations for Characterizing DIF with Meaningful Consequences Within The Rasch Model Framework. Plos One, 14(4), e0215073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215073

Sari, A. A., & Rahmawati, R. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Aloe Vera in Wound Healing. Pharmacon: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia, 20(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.23917/pharmacon.v20i1.22312

Supriani, I., Iswati, S., Bella, F. I., & Tumewang, Y. K. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Zakat Literature from 1964 to 2021. Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v5i2.18511

Supriyadi, E., Inayah, S., Dahlan, J. A., & Darhim, D. (2022). Bibliometric Review: Elementary and Mathematics Education from Indonesian Authors. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v9i2.19481

Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression Procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00754.x

Teresi, J. A., Ramirez, M., Lai, J.-S., & Silver, S. (2008). Occurrences and Sources of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Description of DIF Methods, and Review of Measures of Depression, Quality of Life and General Health. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 538.

Visser, M., Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-Scale Comparison of Bibliographic Data Sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

Witze, A. (2016). Research Gets Increasingly International. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19198

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i4.7463

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2008 times
PDF - 146 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Suwanda Priyadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.